Buddhism
in Tibet
(From Wikepedia)
Early
history
In
the reign of King Thothori Nyantsen (5th
century),
a
basket of Buddhist scriptures arrived in Tibet from India. Written in
Sanskrit, they were not translated into Tibetan until the reign of king Songtsän Gampo (618-649).
While there is doubt about the level of Songtsän Gampo's interest in Buddhism,
it is known that he married a Chinese Tang Dynasty Buddhist
princess, Wencheng,
who came to Tibet with a statue of Shakyamuni Buddha. It is however clear from
Tibetan sources that some of his successors became ardent Buddhists. The
records show that Chinese Buddhists were
actively involved in missionary activity in Tibet, they did not have
the same level of imperial support as Indian Buddhists, with tantric lineages
from Bihar and Bengal.
According
to a Tibetan legendary tradition, Songtsän Gampo also married a Nepalese Buddhist
princess, Bhrikuti.
By the second half of the 8th century he was already regarded as an embodiment
of the Bodhisattva Avalokiteśvara.
The
successors of Songtsän Gampo were less enthusiastic about the propagation of
Buddhism but in the 8th century, King Trisong Detsen (755-797)
established it as the official religion of the state. He invited Indian
Buddhist scholars to his court. In his age the famous tantric mystic Padmasambhāva arrived
in Tibet according to the Tibetan tradition. In addition to writing a number of
important scriptures, some of which he hid for future tertons to find, Padmasambhāva, along
with Śāntarakṣita,
established the Nyingma school.
The
outlines of the history of Buddhism in Tibet from this time are
well-known. At this early time also, from the south came the influence of
scholars under the Pāla dynasty in
the Indian state of Magadha. They had achieved a blend of Mahāyāna and Vajrayāna that
has come to characterize all forms of Tibetan Buddhism. Their teaching in sutra
centered on the Abhisamayālankāra,
a 4th-century Yogācārin text,
but prominent among them were the Mādhyamika scholars Śāntarakṣita and Kamalaśīla.
A
third influence was that of the Sarvāstivādins from
Kashmir in the south west and Khotan in
the north west. Although they did not succeed in maintaining a presence in
Tibet, their texts found their way into the Tibetan Buddhist
canon, providing the Tibetans with almost
all of their primary sources about the Foundation Vehicle.
A subsect of this school, Mūlasarvāstivāda was
the source of the Tibetan vinaya.
The
Chinese princess Jincheng (Kon-co) and the Khotanese monks
The
Chinese princess Jincheng Gongzhu (zh:金城公主) (?-739), the "real
daughter" of the king of Yong, and an adoptive daughter of Emperor Zhongzong of Tang (r.
705-710),
was sent to Tibet in 710 where, according to
most sources, she married Mes-ag-tshoms, who would have been only six or seven
years old at the time. She was known in Tibet as Gyim shang Ong co, or,
simply, Kim-sheng or Kong-co, and was a devout Buddhist.
Five
Buddhist temples were built at: 'Ching bu nam ra, Kwa chu in Brag dmar, 'Gran
bzang, 'Khar brag and sMas gong. Buddhist monks
from Khotan (Li),
fleeing the persecutions of an anti-Buddhist king, were given refuge by
Kim-sheng about 737. The story of these Khotanese monks is recorded the Li
yul lung-btsan-pa or 'Prophecy of the Li Country', a Buddhist history of
Khotan which has been preserved as part of the Tibetan Tanjur.
Kim-sheng
died during an outbreak of smallpox sometime
between 739 and 741. The rise of anti-Buddhist factions in Tibet following the
death of the Chinese princess began to blame the epidemic on the support of
Buddhism by the king and queen. This forced the monks to flee once again;
first to Gandhara,
and then to Kosambi in
central India where the monks apparently ended up quarrelling and slaughtering
each other.
Padmasambhāva,
founder of the Nyingmapa,
the earliest school of Tibetan Buddhism; note the wide-open eyes,
characteristic of a particular method of meditation.
Chan
Influence
Tibetan
king Khri srong lde btsan (742–797)
invited the Chan master Mo Ho Yen (和尚摩訶衍)
(whose name consists of the same Chinese characters used to transliterate “Mahayana”)
(Tibetan: Hwa shang Mahayana) to transmit the Dharma at Samye Monastery. Mo-ho-yen
had been disseminating Dharma in the Tun-huang locale, but, according to
Tibetan sources, lost an important philosophical debate on the nature of
emptiness with the Indian master Kamalaśīla,
and the king declared Kamalaśīla's philosophy should form the basis for Tibetan
Buddhism. Kamalaśīla wrote the three Bhāvanākrama texts (修習次第三篇)
after that. However, a Chinese source found in Dunhuang written
by Mo-ho-yen says their side won, and some scholars conclude that the entire
episode is fictitious. Pioneering Buddhologist Giuseppe Tucci speculated
that Hwashang's ideas were preserved by the Nyingmapas in the form of dzogchen teachings. According
to A. W. Barber of the University of Calgary, Chan Buddhism
was introduced to the Nyingmapa in
three principal streams: the teachings of Korean Master Kim, Kim Ho-shang,
(Chin ho shang) 金和尚 transmitted by Sang Shi in ca. 750
AD; the lineage of Master Wu Chu (無住禪師)
of the Pao T'ang School was transmitted within Tibet by Ye-shes Wangpo; and the
teaching from Mo-ho-yen, that were a synthesis of the Northern School of Chan
and the Pao T'ang School. John Myrdhin
Reynolds and Sam van Schaik hold
a very different point of view. Reynolds states "Except for a brief
flirtation with Ch'an in the early days of Buddhism in Tibet in the eighth
century, the Tibetans exhibited almost no interest at all in Chinese Buddhism,
except for translating a few Sutras from Chinese for which they did not possess
Indian originals." Schaik emphasises that Chan and Dzogchen are based
on two different classes of scripture, Chan being based on sutras, while
Dzogchen being based on tantras. Schaik further states "apparent
similarities can be misleading."
Whichever
maybe the case, Tibetan Buddhist today trace their spiritual roots to Indian
masters such as Padmasambhava, Atisa, Tilopa, Naropa and their later Tibetan
Students.
Later
history
Atiśa
From
the outset Buddhism was opposed by the native shamanistic Bön religion,
which had the support of the aristocracy, but with royal patronage it thrived
to a peak under King Rälpachän (817-836). Terminology in translation was
standardised around 825, enabling a translation methodology that was highly
literal. Despite a reversal in Buddhist influence which began under King
Langdarma (836-842), the following centuries saw a colossal effort in
collecting available Indian sources, many of which are now extant only in
Tibetan translation.
Tibetan
Buddhism exerted a strong influence from the 11th century AD among the peoples
of Inner Asia,
especially the Mongols. It was adopted as an official state religion by
the Mongol Yuan dynasty and
the Manchu Qing dynasty that
ruled China.
The Mongols may have been attracted to the Lamaist tradition and responded the
way they did due to the Lamaist's superficial culture similarities with the
Mongol's shamanist culture. Even with this attraction, however, the Mongols
"paid little attention to the fine points of Buddhist
doctrine." Coinciding with the early discoveries of "hidden treasures"
(terma), the 11th century saw a revival of Buddhist influence originating
in the far east and far west of Tibet. In the west, Rinchen Zangpo (958-1055)
was active as a translator and founded temples and monasteries. Prominent
scholars and teachers were again invited from India. In 1042 Atiśa arrived
in Tibet at the invitation of a west Tibetan king. This renowned exponent of
the Pāla form of Buddhism from the Indian university of Vikramaśīla later
moved to central Tibet. There his chief disciple, Dromtonpa founded the Kadampa school
of Tibetan Buddhism, under whose influence the New Translation schools of
today evolved.
No comments:
Post a Comment